Compare PitchBook pricing, features and alternatives

Multiples is a modern alternative to PitchBook covering all valuation and deal intelligence workflows. It has public comps (licensed by FactSet and Morningstar), M&A transaction comps and VC round data. The database holds 19,000+ public companies (with consensus estimates), 165,000+ M&A deals and 330,000+ funding rounds. EV/Revenue, EV/EBITDA and 130+ other fields are available for every public company. Revenue and EBITDA multiples are available for every M&A and VC deal with disclosed financials.

Multiples' plans start at $239/month with annual billing. Monthly subscription is also available. Excel/Sheets add-in comes with all paid plans. MCP integration is available at the higher tier ($399/month billed annually, $499 monthly).

Multiples database differentiates from PitchBook also with much more granular sector taxonomy. Data is split across 220+ sectors and sub-sectors, and niche categories like e.g. B2B marketplaces or Vertical AI applications. This allows for more precise comps screening and benchmarking.

Compared to PitchBook, you get more comprehensive valuation data for a fraction of the PB's price. Multiples however has no fund returns data, no patent data, no LP information and no email contacts. Its private-company coverage is also tied to deals rather than profiles (so you won't find niche or unknown companies without deal data here).

CB Insights tracks 12 million companies and sells research built on that data. Their main strength is deep sector research, custom analyst briefs and Mosaic scores - an algorithmic health rating built for startups. CB Insights focuses on tech, whereas PitchBook has broader coverage.

Pricing-wise, similarly to PitchBook it is quoted per team and reported at $40,000-$100,000 per year, billed annually. Minimum number of seats applies too. CB Insights does not publish pricing officially, but G2 and Reddit users report that it is at or above PitchBook's price.

CB Insights integrates with Excel, Salesforce, Snowflake, and other popular data platforms. Enterprise agreements with API are available too.

Compared to PitchBook, CB Insights is better at tech research and market analysis, and weaker as a raw deal database. Coverage of very early, pre-institutional companies is limited, and there is no fund performance, LP data or contact data.

Gain.pro and PitchBook are both private market intelligence platforms, but they cater to different regional strengths. PitchBook is an established global giant with deep roots in VC, PE, and M&A data across North America. In contrast, Gain approaches market intelligence with an AI-native architecture, offering localized, highly structured company profiles and robust European market coverage.

Gain's coverage centres on Europe. The deal database holds half a million transactions. Gain has no public companies data.

PitchBook is better in macro-level deal tracking, fund performance benchmarks, and broad venture ecosystem visibility. Gain might win on granular private company transparency and deeper intelligence across Europe.

Neither platform posts transparent or fixed price sheets on their public websites, as both require custom quote. PitchBook is one of the most expensive platforms on the market, typically quoting $25,000-40,000/yr. Gain pricing is undisclosed, but expected to be slightly cheaper - yet still very "enterprise"-focused.

Choose Gain if you need European private company research. For more extensive private markets "workstation" and global data coverage, PitchBook will be a better choice for most enterprise teams.

Tracxn is an Indian company, based in Bengaluru and is itself publicly listed on the NSE. Its platform tracks 3M+ companies, maintained by an in-house analyst team.

Mid-level price point: a single-user plan is reported at around $550 per month, team licenses are quoted and reported at $6,500-$15,000 per year - cheaper than PitchBook.

Coverage is deepest in India, where companies file financials with the registrar - Tracxn often has revenue and profit figures for companies that US databases list with just a name and a website. Stage and sector tagging is detailed across the platform.

Compared to PitchBook, valuations and deal terms are thin, and there are no public consensus estimates. In India and Southeast Asia, Tracxn’s coverage is often better than PitchBook’s.

Harmonic claims it tracks 35M+ companies and 195M+ people profiles, with key companies refreshed daily. It picks up signals that many databases miss: stealth incorporations, founder departures, employee growth, website updates, social traction, etc.

Pricing is quoted per team and reported at $10,000-$30,000 per year. There is very limited public markets data in the product. Harmonic is a discovery platform, not a valuation/comps database.

It is built API-first: REST and GraphQL endpoints, data-warehouse sync and MCP access, plus native Affinity, Salesforce and HubSpot integrations. Scout, Harmonic's built-in AI agent is available for human-language queries.

Harmonic overlaps with PitchBook only on sourcing. Harmonic finds companies before a round is announced, PitchBook records the round after it happens. In terms of deal intelligence or public comps data, PitchBook wins.

Mergermarket (owned by ION Analytics) is an M&A intelligence platform, reporting on M&A processes before they are announced. It tracks mandates, auctions and sale preparations, sourced by a journalist network across EMEA, the Americas and APAC. It carries a deal database with 400,000+ transactions tracked since 1998, plus various deal league tables.

Reported pricing starts around $30,000 per year with annual contracts only - a similar price range to PitchBook.

ION also sells programmatic access: the Acuris M&A Deals API for the deal history and an Intelligence API with over 2M+ articles.

Mergermarket beats PitchBook on deal intelligence. It reports deals months before PitchBook records them, but it does not replace a full-stack database: there is no public comps data, and no contact information.

Grata is a different product than PitchBook: it builds company profiles by crawling websites instead of tracking funding events. It covers founder-owned, bootstrapped US mid-market businesses. The crawl covers 21M+ companies and 8M+ verified executive contacts (vendor-claimed).

Reported pricing runs $15,000-$40,000 per year, quoted per team. There is no public-company data, no fund data and very little deal history.

Grata beats PitchBook at one thing: coverage and contacts for US mid-market comps that never raised money. It has no valuations, no multiples and no fund data, and coverage outside North America is thin.