
- Insights
- Unicorns Minted in 2025
Unicorns Minted in 2025
Which unicorns were created in 2025?
Over 140 unicorns were minted in 2025!
5 new unicorns have been added end of July and through August, all coming from the ๐บ๐ธ US, and all but one (Polymarket) being AI-native.
Nearly 80% of all unicorns minted in 2025 were created in the US.
Visible growth in the Middle East, with three unicorns minted in 2025 - ๐ฆ๐ชย Xpanceoย (deep tech), ๐ฆ๐ชย The Open Platformย (crypto), and ๐ธ๐ฆย Ninjaย (e-commerce).
Within Europe, ๐ฌ๐ง the UK is the clear leader, having created unicorns likeย PhysicsXย (AI),ย Ceraย (health),ย Isomorphic Labsย (biotech) andย MUBIย (streaming).
Complete AI domination - 70% that became unicorns are AI-native, and the remaining 30% operates in other sectors.
# | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ๐บ๐ธ | $12.0B | $3,000M | seed round | Jul-25 | AI | |||
2 | ๐บ๐ธ | $8.0B | $2,000M | Series B | Nov-25 | AI | |||
3 | ๐บ๐ธ | $5.0B | $500M | Series A | Oct-25 | Non-AI | |||
4 | ๐บ๐ธ | $4.5B | $475M | Seed | Dec-25 | AI | |||
5 | ๐บ๐ธ | $4.0B | $250M | growth round | Aug-25 | AI | |||
6 | ๐บ๐ธ | $4.0B | $250M | Series C | Oct-25 | AI | |||
7 | ๐บ๐ธ | $4.0B | $900M | Series C | Nov-25 | AI | |||
8 | ๐บ๐ธ | $3.5B | $210M | Series B | Jul-25 | AI | |||
9 | ๐บ๐ธ | $3.1B | $100M | growth round | Aug-25 | AI | |||
10 | ๐บ๐ธ | $3.0B | $37M | 81.1x | $100M | Series C | Jun-25 | AI | |
11 | ๐บ๐ธ | $3.0B | $100M | Series B | Jan-25 | Non-AI | |||
12 | ๐บ๐ธ | $3.0B | $260M | Series E | Sep-25 | Non-AI | |||
13 | ๐บ๐ธ | $3.0B | $700M | Series B | Dec-25 | Non-AI | |||
14 | ๐บ๐ธ | $2.8B | $350M | Series B | Jul-25 | Non-AI | |||
15 | ๐บ๐ธ | $2.8B | $8M | 361.8x | $250M | Series D | Feb-25 | AI | |
16 | ๐บ๐ธ | $2.7B | $150M | Series D | Jul-25 | AI | |||
17 | ๐บ๐ธ | $2.6B | $190M | Series C | Mar-25 | AI | |||
18 | ๐บ๐ธ | $2.5B | $250M | Series C | Mar-25 | AI | |||
19 | ๐บ๐ธ | $2.5B | $100M | 25.0x | $200M | Series B | May-25 | Non-AI | |
20 | ๐บ๐ธ | $2.5B | $250M | Series C | Nov-25 | AI | |||
21 | ๐บ๐ธ | $2.2B | $150M | Series D | Sep-25 | AI | |||
22 | ๐บ๐ธ | $2.1B | $68M | Series B | Nov-25 | AI | |||
23 | ๐จ๐ณ | $2.1B | $208M | 9.9x | undisclosed | Series B | Mar-25 | AI | |
24 | ๐บ๐ธ | $2.0B | $250M | growth round | Jul-25 | Non-AI | |||
25 | ๐ฌ๐ง | $2.0B | $315M | growth round | Aug-25 | AI | |||
26 | ๐บ๐ธ | $2.0B | $275M | Series C | May-25 | AI | |||
27 | ๐บ๐ธ | $2.0B | $24M | 83.3x | $185M | Series C | Jun-25 | Non-AI | |
28 | ๐บ๐ธ | $2.0B | $75M | 26.7x | $100M | Series B | Jan-25 | AI | |
29 | ๐บ๐ธ | $2.0B | $200M | Series D | Mar-25 | Non-AI | |||
30 | ๐บ๐ธ | $2.0B | $150M | Series B | Mar-25 | AI | |||
31 | ๐บ๐ธ | $2.0B | $415M | Series C | Aug-25 | AI | |||
32 | ๐บ๐ธ | $2.0B | $150M | Series E | Dec-25 | Non-AI | |||
33 | ๐บ๐ธ | $2.0B | $100M | growth round | Sep-25 | AI | |||
34 | ๐บ๐ธ | $2.0B | $610M | Series D | Oct-25 | Non-AI | |||
35 | ๐บ๐ธ | $2.0B | $400M | 4.9x | $138M | Series C | Feb-25 | Non-AI | |
36 | ๐บ๐ธ | $1.9B | $350M | Series B | Nov-25 | AI | |||
37 | ๐ธ๐ช | $1.8B | $260M | Series B | Jan-25 | AI | |||
38 | ๐บ๐ธ | $1.8B | $75M | 24.0x | $200M | Series A | Jul-25 | AI | |
39 | ๐บ๐ธ | $1.8B | $1,000M | 1.8x | $72M | Series C | Jan-25 | Non-AI | |
40 | ๐บ๐ธ | $1.8B | $175M | Series B | Sep-25 | AI | |||
41 | ๐บ๐ธ | $1.8B | $300M | Series D | Dec-25 | Non-AI | |||
42 | ๐บ๐ธ | $1.8B | $300M | Series D | Sep-25 | Non-AI | |||
43 | ๐ฌ๐ง | $1.8B | $605M | series A | Mar-25 | AI | |||
44 | ๐บ๐ธ | $1.7B | $165M | Series B | Feb-25 | Non-AI | |||
45 | ๐จ๐ณ | $1.7B | $140M | 11.9x | $97M | Series C | Jun-25 | Non-AI | |
46 | ๐บ๐ธ | $1.6B | $141M | Series B | Jan-25 | AI | |||
47 | ๐ฎ๐ช | $1.6B | $185M | Series B | Jun-25 | Non-AI | |||
48 | ๐บ๐ธ | $1.6B | $44M | 37.0x | $122M | Series D | Jun-25 | AI | |
49 | ๐บ๐ธ | $1.6B | $365M | Series D | May-25 | AI | |||
50 | ๐บ๐ธ | $1.6B | $250M | growth round | Sep-25 | AI |
Rows per page
Data and methodology
Underlying data
Public markets data is powered by FactSet (consensus analyst estimates), and Morningstar (historical data). Data points are calendarized to December where relevant: retrieved data on financial year ends (e.g. FY, FY+1 etc.) are mapped to calendar years (2025A, 2026E etc.) before the appropriate month weights are then applied to prior/future fundamentals.
Private transaction data is multi-sourced, aggregated from harvesting public information, 3rd party APIs, and data engineering. All data is verified and provided with an extensive manual process. If data permits, we apply our own logic to get to the EV. For example, for a large M&A deal with available information on the target's net debt, we might adjust a valuation to fully reflect an accurate EV. In all other cases, we take the reported valuation as the numerator. Financials: we source LTM revenue and LTM EBITDA data from company filings, press releases, or other verified sources. If LTM data is unavailable, we take the 'next best-fit' period (run-rate or calendar year), provided it makes sense in a given case. For example, if a deal closed in November 2025, we might take full-year 2025 revenue as a revenue benchmark.
Any raw figures are harmonised to USD for comparison purposes.
This page is built on data available at Multiples. Sign up for a free trial to see the full dataset.
Start Your
Free Trial Today
Try Multiples for free for 3 days. Got questions or need a demo? Schedule a call with us below.


















